Don't forget. That which is evil is not originally evil. What is evil? It is that which is a part of that which is opposing to goodness, is opposing God, as a whole, and that part of love that is opposing to the whole might be the true form of evil.
When a part insists on being the whole, there cannot be any latitude or the like. That which the part is insisting on being is also one of the expressions of the children of God. But everybody is given the love of a part, and when all of them take hands and are fused together well, the harmony of love and the circulation of love could be formed. Nevertheless, when the part begins to insist, saying it is superior to the whole, the circulation of love is disturbed, and it forms a sediment and it makes a shadow. This is the figure of evil.
But looking over from the flow of the big, big universe, there couldn't exist an evil that is fully absolute. It would be only a stagnant of light, a part of the stagnation of the circulation of love. There would be such a point of view. So, that which is called evil is a very tiny tip viewed from the love of the grand universe of the big, big providence of God. And they who seem evil are also the children of God.
Soon it would be caught up in the flow of time, the whirlpool, being swallowed in the providence of the circulation of love, and there a symphony of the grand universe will have been made. As was told to you a while ago, the grand universe is emitting sounds. There is that which is being a sound like it, of the vibration, symphony, or collaboration, and on those things there are sounds like 'doe', 'ray', 'mi', 'fa', 'so', 'la', 'te', 'do', aren't there? But actually there are more sounds than you can comprehend. In this situation, they all are playing the harmony.
Certainly 'doe' is splendid because it is doe, and ray is splendid because it is being 'ray'. But if 'doe' insists that only itself is absolute, or only itself is absolutely splendid, it would break out even the orchestra or music, wouldn't it?
'Doe' is splendid of course, but 'ray' and 'me' and 'fa' and 'so' and 'la' and 'te' are all splendid. Its attitude, a capacity to accept them, is the love itself. Its latitude, the overall scope it could hold, the view of comprehension, the capacity to receive it, the patience, the tenderness, the latitude, but in one word, it could be called love. In order to accept all the things in the universe, all the living things, to forgive, make alive, and make alive others' lives as the children of God, he has always been sending out love.
It is the providence of the grand universe and the heart of God of the grand universe. When you exist in the place, a feeling of being made alive is there, which we have had and which is like Amor. If we have been made alive, and if we are the 'doe,' certainly we have to make efforts to make alive all the children of God of the other of 'ray', 'me', 'fa', 'so', 'la', and 'te'.
It is the feeling that I am even being a 'doe,' but being made alive, it would be the thanks Amor was talking about. A wish of thanks is becoming to the mentality loving others which makes the others alive, and it is sending the love into others. Those who cannot thank can not love others. It was said that the thanks and love are the two sides of the same coin. It is the same thing. So if I were to say, or if Amor were to say, or if Moses were to come and say, or Zoroaster came instead, or even if someone else were to say something, what would be told about love would be the same in the end. But, among those, when as the great master of love Amor, or namely Jesus, talked about love in very beautiful words, it became such a powerful message.
(Channeled message from El-Ranty (Shinji Takahashi) ： August 6, 2005）
source of reference： "Messages to the Children of God in the Space Age" (Kindle)
