Question: In order to bind enlightenment and love, OR grouped the love into several categories like "love to love", "love to make alive", "love to forgive." What significance is there for this? And what do you think about these things?
Amor: Well, it is that which has been established in a step-wise and academic approach. Love is actually being that which I have been talking about up till now.
Under the fundamental principle of love and fundamental principle of cosmos, it has been a law that makes others and the self alive.
But it has been formed very academically; well, I would think it was made academically in the form of the cross section from the particular side.
Therefore, though he has explained that "he himself is being the love of existence," he hasn't talked about what "the love of existence" is to be even a little bit. It has only been told in the context of that idea that love is from "the love toward ones own" and "that toward the others", to the worlds of 'bosatu (bodhisattva)' and 'nyorai (tathagata)', and finally to the "love of existence."
Now I have just told you, but ultimately it is the children of God. Actually I have already told you the answer.
Since it is being higher as from seventh to ninth dimension, since we are being in a higher place, the position of giving love is not meant to be high. I have told you this point.
In love, there is no relation to the height.
In love, only the richness has meaning.
Only by the degree how many people you will be able to love, there are seventh, eighth, and ninth dimensions. It is not the relation of high and low. I would like to clarify this point.
And I have said the love to others and that which loves the self is very narrow.
Opposing it, the love of the seventh dimension or higher is about serving others rather than oneself and to love is the circulation of love of the fundamental of the divinity that the love is flowing outward from oneself.
But the love comprising a thought one must serve is still an "infant" in its perception, from our point of view. Why is it?
It is because there is the self who is giving love, with the thought that one must serve. It is meant that there is still ego.
Even though, the self is a child of God created from God.
It is meant to be "the passage of love", as I have told you earlier. Look at this person.
Do you think there is an ego for a person who takes a message from heaven like this? She must remove her own will.
Only giving fully her own sensitivity and language capacity to our consciousness, the consciousness of heaven.Looking over the figure of this person, you have to learn that this person is the passage of love.
There must not be any thought of ones own, even a single thought. It is the work of a medium.
Only give the self fully to the will of God.
And, in order to become a pipe between heaven and the ground, as a passage of love, it is to convey our word directly to you.
Based on that which exists like this, the love of heaven, our wisdom of heaven is conveyed to this ground.
What can you say about this if you don't say it is a miracle?
By the figure of his sort that is bringing the word to the humankind, it is called "a passage of love."
If you have heard this word, "be the passage of love by yourself." So I would like to say this.
No matter how you say it, whether it be 'Nyorai (tathagata) world' or 'Bosatsu (bodhisattva) world', I do not mind what it is called.
As a passage of love. It should have been told to you earlier in this Lemuria: "Though there exist all of you, God has created each of you, expecting the different individuality and possibility according to the degree of the light," and "The children of God is something like that." There is no equivalent or alternative for each one of you.
As precious and precious, only one, irreplaceable children of God, you have been created.Accordingly, do shine yourself as a passage of love.
To share the love for many people by shining your ray at their maximum, as a passage of love, as the children of God, and for the plan of God ultimately, to make the planet of love of God, for this great plan of salvation, shine your own light, your own possibility, and individuality.
It is your role.
As a medium, this person exists for the salvation of this time. As a passage, she is being in front of you now as a tool of God, isn't she?
If it is so, it is meant that you yourself are given a different individuality and talent from this person.
Accordingly, "in your capacity, in your individuality, in what kind of individuality, are you going to become a passage of love or shine?"
This means that you have had that as the task of life on the ground.
It is meant that you must not be like "Tell me what to do," like a windfall profit. Those persons are regarded as the ones who cannot have any capacity to proceed in their practice as the messengers of God.
Now in this way you are hearing our word directly in front of us. Looking over the figure hearing this, be aware of your own divinity. Those who are being the children of God are you yourself, being the expressive form of love, being the chunk of love, being the light of love itself. So I have been talking to you repeatedly.
If it is so, instead of judging others, according to the fundamental law of cosmos, give love and give and give, forgive, forgive, and continue to forgive, and even if being hurt, give away of yourself to those.
Without holding anything, shine your own divinity, shine for that which is to be done by yourself originally.
This means that you express the love and shine all around the ground as the light of love, as a passage of love and the children of God.
I would think it is going far from the fundamental principle of love to speak from the view of discrimination as sixth, seventh, eighth dimensions and the step- wise approach. Though I think it would not be favorable to point out while he is alive, there is no difference between high and low in the fundamental principle of love.
(Channeled message from Amor (Jesus Christ) ： July 30, 2005）
source of reference： "Messages to the Children of God in the Space Age" (Kindle)
